Optimisation and real time reaction monitoring of the synthesis of 2-fluoromalonate esters by direct fluorination using fluorine gas is reported. An assessment of green metrics including atom economy and process mass intensity factors, demonstrates that the one-step selective direct fluorination process compares very favourably with established multistep processes for the synthesis of fluoromalonates.
Scheme 2 Synthetic routes to 2-fluoromalonate esters.
There are three realistic, low-cost 
synthetic strategies available for the large scale manufacture of 
diethyl 2-fluoromalonate ester (Scheme 2) which involve reaction of ethanol with hexafluoropropene (HFP), halogen exchange (Halex)and selective direct fluorination
 processes. Other syntheses of fluoromalonate esters using electrophilic
 fluorinating agents such as Selectfluor™ are possible, but are not 
sufficiently commercially attractive to be considered for manufacture on
 the large scale.
A growing number of patents 
utilising fluoromalonate as a substrate for the synthesis of a range of 
biologically active systems have been published 
 For example, Fluoxastrobin (Fandango®), a fungicide marketed by Bayer 
CropScience that has achieved global annual sales of over €140 m since 
its launch in 2005, and TAK-733, an anti-cancer drug candidate, employ 2-fluoromalonate esters as the key fluorinated starting material (Scheme 1).
| Scheme 1 2-Fluoromalonate esters used in the synthesis of Fluoxastrobin and TAK-733. | |||||||||||||||||||||
 Before a comparison of the green metrics between 
the three possible, economically viable large scale processes for the 
synthesis of fluoromalonate esters (Scheme 2)
 could be carried out, some primary goals for the optimisation of the 
process were targeted: complete conversion of the starting material is 
essential because it can be difficult to separate the starting material 
from the desired monofluorinated product by simple distillation; 
fluorine gas usage should be minimised because neutralisation of excess 
reagent could potentially generate significant amounts of waste; 
reduction in volumes of solvents used to reduce waste streams and 
overall intensification of the fluorination process and replacement 
and/or reduction of all environmentally harmful solvents used.
      
Conventional batch direct fluorination 
reactions of malonate esters were carried out in glassware vessels by 
introduction of fluorine gas, as a 10% or 20% mixture in nitrogen (v/v),
 at a prescribed rate via a gas mass flow 
controller into a solution of malonate ester and copper nitrate catalyst
 in acetonitrile using equipment described previously.
To better understand the relationship between
 fluorine gas introduction and rate of conversion, real time IR 
spectroscopic monitoring of the reaction was chosen as the most suitable
 technique. The use of the ReactIR technique was enabled by a sufficient difference in the carbonyl group stretching frequencies (1734 cm−1 for diethyl malonate and 1775 cm−1 for diethyl 2-fluoromalonate) and provided an in situ reaction profile (Fig. 1).
| Fig. 1 IR spectra of the fluorination reaction at 0% (light blue), 50% (dark blue) and 100% (red) conversions. | ||||||||
The real time reaction monitoring (Fig. 1 and 2)
 revealed that the reaction begins instantly upon initiation of fluorine
 introduction and the reaction conversion is directly proportional to 
the amount of fluorine gas passed into the reaction vessel. When the 
intensity of the fluoromalonate carbonyl peak (1775 cm−1) reached a maximum, the introduction of fluorine gas was stopped and the crude reaction mixture was analysed by 1H and 19F
 NMR spectroscopy. Complete conversion of the starting material was 
observed and diethyl fluoromalonate was formed with 93% selectivity 
after introducing 1.1 equivalents of fluorine into the reaction mixture.
 The small excess of fluorine explains the unexpectedly small amount of 
difluorinated side products B and C 
(4.5 and 2.5% respectively) which were the major impurities (6.5 and 9% 
respectively) when larger excess of fluorine gas (1.8 eq.) was used.
The effect of concentration of fluorine in 
nitrogen, reaction temperature, copper nitrate catalyst loading and 
concentration of malonate substrate in acetonitrile were varied to 
optimise the fluorination process (Table 1). Additionally, reactions described in Table 1
 allowed an assessment of various factors that have a major influence on
 the environmental impact of the process such as solvent usage, reaction
 temperature and the amount and composition of waste generated. In each 
case 20 mmol (3.20 g) of diethyl malonate was used as substrate and the 
isolated mass balance of crude material obtained after work-up was 
recorded along with the conversion of starting material and yield of 
fluorinated products (Table 1).
Table 1 Fluorination of diethyl malonate ester using fluorine gas catalysed by Cu(NO3)2·2.5H2O
  
| Entry no. | T/°C | C malonate (mol L−1) | Catalyst (mol%) | F 2 in N2 (% v/v) | Conversion (1H NMR) | A/B/C ratio (19F NMR) | Isolated weight | 
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0–5 | 1.0 | 10 | 10 | 100% | 93.5/4.5/2 | 3.37 g | 
| 2 | 0–5 | 1.5 | 10 | 10 | 100% | 94/4/2 | 3.30 g | 
| 3 | 0–5 | 1.0 | 5 | 10 | 97% | 95/4/1 | 3.53 g | 
| 4 | 0–5 | 1.0 | 2.5 | 10 | 82% | 95/4/1 | 3.51 g | 
| 5 | RT | 1.0 | 10 | 10 | 56% | 97.5/1.5/1 | 3.33 g | 
| 6 | 0–5 | 1.0 | 10 | 15 | 85% | 97.5/1.5/1 | 3.47 g | 
| 7 | 0–5 | 1.0 | 10 | 20 | 100% | 94/3/3 | 3.50 g | 
| 8 | 0–5 | 2.0 | 5 | 20 | 52% | 92/5/3 | 3.40 g | 
In all cases, small quantities of side products were formed which were identified by 19F
 NMR and these originate from two different processes: 
3,3-difluoromalonate is produced from enolisation of diethyl 
fluoromalonate which is much slower than enolisation of the diethyl 
malonate substrate, while the fluoroethyl fluoromalonate is postulated 
to form via an electrophilic process.
The data in Table 1
 suggest that the concentration of the malonate ester substrate in 
acetonitrile has no apparent effect on the outcome of the reaction 
although solvent is required for these reactions because diethyl 
malonate does not dissolve the catalyst. Additionally, the use of high 
dielectric constant media, such as acetonitrile, have been found to be 
beneficial for the control of selectivity of electrophilic direct 
fluorination processes.
 For convenience, a 1.5 M concentration of malonate in acetonitrile was 
chosen as the optimal conditions which is approximately 5 mL solvent per
 1 mL of diethyl malonate.
The concentration of fluorine gas, between 
10–20% v/v in nitrogen, does not affect the selectivity of the reaction 
and the quality of the product either, as exemplified by the product 
mixtures obtained from reactions 1, 2 and 7 which have identical 
compositions. In contrast, carrying out fluorination reactions at room 
temperature rather than cooling the reaction mixture to 0–5 °C leads to 
increased catalyst decomposition which results in an insoluble copper 
species that on occasion blocked the fluorine gas inlet tube. In 
addition, without cooling, the exothermic nature of this fluorination 
reaction led to a slight reaction temperature increase (from 20 to 29 °C
 in a small scale laboratory experiment) resulting in loss of some 
solvent and some decomposition of the catalyst and product degradation.
Lowering the concentration of the copper 
nitrate catalyst led to a significantly slower reaction as would be 
expected and required the use of a larger excess of fluorine gas to 
enable sufficiently high conversion. For example, the reaction proceeded
 in the presence of only 2.5 mol% catalyst, but in this case 40% excess 
fluorine was required to reach 100% conversion.
Typical literature work-up procedures for direct fluorination reactions
 involve pouring the reaction mixture into 3 to 5 volumes of water and 
extracting the resulting mixture three times with dichloromethane. The 
combined organic fraction is typically washed with water, saturated 
sodium bicarbonate solution and dried over sodium sulfate before 
evaporation of the solvent to give the crude reaction product. We sought
 to improve the work-up to enable recycling of the reaction solvent and 
substitute the use of environmentally harmful dichloromethane in the 
reaction work-up stage. Upon completion of fluorine gas addition, 
acetonitrile was evaporated for reuse and then the residue was 
partitioned between ethyl acetate and water, the organic phase was 
washed with water, saturated Na2CO3
 solution and saturated brine and dried prior to evaporation under 
reduced pressure. Modification of the workup procedure in this manner 
enables the recovery of acetonitrile and ethyl acetate and significantly
 reduces the amount of aqueous waste generated. When direct reuse of the
 recovered acetonitrile was attempted, a copper containing precipitate 
was formed presumably because of the high HF content of the solvent 
(0.63 M by titration). Therefore, before reuse of the solvent, HF must 
be removed. Stirring the recovered reaction solvent with solid Na2CO3
 lowered the acid content to an acceptable level (0.04 M) and when a 
second fluorination reaction was carried out in the recovered, 
neutralised acetonitrile, no change in the fluorination reaction profile
 was observed.
Upon completion of these optimisation 
studies, selective fluorination reactions of malonate esters were scaled
 up to 40 g scale in the laboratory without experiencing any change in 
product profile. Isolation of significant quantities of 
monofluoromalonate A crude product (99% yield, 95% 
purity) was achieved which could be used in the subsequent cyclisation 
processes described below without further purification or, if high 
purity material was required, could be purified by fractional vacuum 
distillation (bp. 102–103 °C, 18 mbar) to produce 99% pure material in 
77% yield.
Related malonate esters were also subjected 
to direct fluorination using the optimised conditions established above.
 In the case of di-tert-butyl malonate, 
fluorination was carried out on 12 g scale. 100% conversion was reached 
after the introduction of 1.2 equivalents of fluorine gas and the 
desired product was isolated in 96% yield. The purity of the crude 
product was higher than 97% by 1H and 19F
 NMR spectroscopy without any further purification and as expected, the 
only side product was the 2,2-difluorinated product (Scheme 3).
| Scheme 3 Fluorination of di-methyl and di-tert-butyl malonates. | ||
Diethyl fluoromalonate large scale fluorination
Diethyl malonate (40.0 g, 0.25 mol) and copper nitrate hydrate (Cu(NO3)2·2.5H2O; 5.81 g, 25 mmol) were dissolved in acetonitrile (200 mL) and placed in 500 mL fluorination vessel, cooled to 0–5 °C and stirred at 650 rpm using an overhead stirrer. After purging the system with N2 for 5 minutes, fluorine gas (20% v/v in N2, 80 mL min−1, 265 mmol) was introduced into the mixture for 6 hours and 30 minutes. The reactor was purged with nitrogen for 10 minutes, the solvent removed in vacuo and the residue partitioned between water (50 mL) and ethyl acetate (50 mL). The aqueous phase was extracted once more with ethyl acetate (50 mL) and the combined organic layers were washed with saturated NaHCO3 (25 mL) and brine (20 mL). After drying over sodium sulfate, the solvent was evaporated to leave diethyl 2-fluoromalonate (44.4 g, 99% yield, 95% purity) as a light yellow, transparent liquid. This crude product was distilled to afford high purity fluoromalonate (34.7 g, 77% yield, 99%+ purity) as a colourless liquid, bp. 102–103 °C (18 mbar), (lit.: 110–112 °C, 29 mbar), spectroscopic data as above.........N. Ishikawa, A. Takaoka and M. K. Ibrahim, J. Fluorine Chem., 1984, 25, 203–212 CrossRef CAS.
PAPER
 REF
DOI: 10.1039/C5GC00402K
(Paper)
Green Chem., 2015, 17, 3000-3009
Fluorine gas for life science syntheses: green metrics to assess selective direct fluorination for the synthesis of 2-fluoromalonate esters†
        
          
            Antal 
            Harsanyi
          
        
       and 
      
        
          
            Graham 
            Sandford
          
        
      *
      
Department of Chemistry, Durham University, South Road, Durham, DH1 3LE, UK. E-mail: graham.sandford@durham.ac.uk
Department of Chemistry, Durham University, South Road, Durham, DH1 3LE, UK. E-mail: graham.sandford@durham.ac.uk
Received 
      19th February 2015
    , Accepted 17th March 2015
First published on the web 17th March 2015
Optimisation
 and real time reaction monitoring of the synthesis of 2-fluoromalonate 
esters by direct fluorination using fluorine gas is reported. An 
assessment of green metrics including atom economy and process mass 
intensity factors, demonstrates that the one-step selective direct 
fluorination process compares very favourably with established multistep
 processes for the synthesis of fluoromalonates.
Paper
                                
Fluorine gas for life science syntheses: green metrics to assess selective direct fluorination for the synthesis of 2-fluoromalonate esters
*Corresponding authors
                                                    
                                                    
                                                
                                                        aDepartment of Chemistry, Durham University, South Road, Durham, UK
                                                    
E-mail: graham.sandford@durham.ac.uk
E-mail: graham.sandford@durham.ac.uk
Green Chem., 2015,17, 3000-3009
DOI: 10.1039/C5GC00402K
 
No comments:
Post a Comment